Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chemspace
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:01, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Chemspace (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Spammy and insufficient evidence of notability. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:01, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 09:16, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 09:16, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete -- Twenty million entries? Type in perchlorate. Nothing. Now type it into WP. Nice article. Type the CAS number 14797-73-0. Nothing. It comes up in Google and WP. Rhadow (talk) 15:47, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete utterly non-notable. Could be merged at Enamine Ltd if that one survives deletion too, but that seems unlikely. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:26, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Non-notable online database.--SamHolt6 (talk) 04:28, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete No indications of notability, fails GNG. -- HighKing++ 18:26, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.